CUED Publications database

The Sensitivity of Counterfactual Fairness to Unmeasured Confounding

Kilbertus, N and Ball, PJ and Kusner, MJ and Weller, A and Silva, R The Sensitivity of Counterfactual Fairness to Unmeasured Confounding. (Unpublished)

Full text not available from this repository.


Causal approaches to fairness have seen substantial recent interest, both from the machine learning community and from wider parties interested in ethical prediction algorithms. In no small part, this has been due to the fact that causal models allow one to simultaneously leverage data and expert knowledge to remove discriminatory effects from predictions. However, one of the primary assumptions in causal modeling is that you know the causal graph. This introduces a new opportunity for bias, caused by misspecifying the causal model. One common way for misspecification to occur is via unmeasured confounding: the true causal effect between variables is partially described by unobserved quantities. In this work we design tools to assess the sensitivity of fairness measures to this confounding for the popular class of non-linear additive noise models (ANMs). Specifically, we give a procedure for computing the maximum difference between two counterfactually fair predictors, where one has become biased due to confounding. For the case of bivariate confounding our technique can be swiftly computed via a sequence of closed-form updates. For multivariate confounding we give an algorithm that can be efficiently solved via automatic differentiation. We demonstrate our new sensitivity analysis tools in real-world fairness scenarios to assess the bias arising from confounding.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cs.LG cs.LG cs.CY stat.ML
Divisions: Div F > Computational and Biological Learning
Depositing User: Cron Job
Date Deposited: 11 Jul 2019 01:16
Last Modified: 18 Feb 2021 18:14