Eastham, SD and Coates, DJ and Parks, GT (2012) A novel method for rapid comparative quantitative analysis of nuclear fuel cycles. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 42. pp. 80-88. ISSN 0306-4549Full text not available from this repository.
One of the greatest obstacles facing the nuclear industry is that of sustainability, both in terms of the finite reserves of uranium ore and the production of highly radiotoxic spent fuel which presents proliferation and environmental hazards. Alternative nuclear technologies have been suggested as a means of delivering enhanced sustainability with proposals including fast reactors, the use of thorium fuel and tiered fuel cycles. The debate as to which is the most appropriate technology continues, with each fuel system and reactor type delivering specific advantages and disadvantages which can be difficult to compare fairly. This paper demonstrates a framework of performance metrics which, coupled with a first-order lumped reactor model to determine nuclide population balances, can be used to quantify the aforementioned pros and cons for a range of different fuel and reactor combinations. The framework includes metrics such as fuel efficiency, spent fuel toxicity and proliferation resistance, and relative cycle performance is analysed through parallel coordinate plots, yielding a quantitative comparison of disparate cycles. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
|Divisions:||Div A > Energy|
|Depositing User:||Unnamed user with email firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Date Deposited:||09 Dec 2016 18:14|
|Last Modified:||29 Apr 2017 00:12|