Ellison, KC and Soga, K and Simpson, B (2010) An examination of strain space versus stress space for the formulation of elastoplastic constitutive models. In: UNSPECIFIED pp. 33-38..Full text not available from this repository.
Several elastoplastic soil models have been proposed over the years that are formulated in strain space rather than stress space due to certain analytical and computational advantages. One such model, BRICK (Simpson 1992), has been continuously utilized and developed for industrial applications within Arup Geotechnics for more than two decades. This paper aims to describe the advantages and difficulties associated with strain space modeling. In addition, it will show how recent advances in modeling the effects of stress history, stiffness anisotropy, strength anisotropy and time-dependence in conventional stress space models can be transferred to the BRICK model. © 2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London.
|Item Type:||Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)|
|Divisions:||Div D > Geotechnical and Environmental|
|Depositing User:||Unnamed user with email email@example.com|
|Date Deposited:||09 Dec 2016 17:48|
|Last Modified:||23 Feb 2017 04:12|