Rüter, J and Marcille, N and Sprekeler, H and Gerstner, W and Herzog, MH (2012) Paradoxical evidence integration in rapid decision processes. PLoS Computational Biology, 8. ISSN 1553-734XFull text not available from this repository.
Decisions about noisy stimuli require evidence integration over time. Traditionally, evidence integration and decision making are described as a one-stage process: a decision is made when evidence for the presence of a stimulus crosses a threshold. Here, we show that one-stage models cannot explain psychophysical experiments on feature fusion, where two visual stimuli are presented in rapid succession. Paradoxically, the second stimulus biases decisions more strongly than the first one, contrary to predictions of one-stage models and intuition. We present a two-stage model where sensory information is integrated and buffered before it is fed into a drift diffusion process. The model is tested in a series of psychophysical experiments and explains both accuracy and reaction time distributions. © 2012 Rüter et al.
|Divisions:||Div F > Computational and Biological Learning|
|Depositing User:||Unnamed user with email firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Date Deposited:||18 May 2016 17:56|
|Last Modified:||29 May 2016 23:07|