Rüter, J and Sprekeler, H and Gerstner, W and Herzog, MH (2013) The Silent Period of Evidence Integration in Fast Decision Making. PLoS ONE, 8.Full text not available from this repository.
In a typical experiment on decision making, one out of two possible stimuli is displayed and observers decide which one was presented. Recently, Stanford and colleagues (2010) introduced a new variant of this classical one-stimulus presentation paradigm to investigate the speed of decision making. They found evidence for "perceptual decision making in less than 30 ms". Here, we extended this one-stimulus compelled-response paradigm to a two-stimulus compelled-response paradigm in which a vernier was followed immediately by a second vernier with opposite offset direction. The two verniers and their offsets fuse. Only one vernier is perceived. When observers are asked to indicate the offset direction of the fused vernier, the offset of the second vernier dominates perception. Even for long vernier durations, the second vernier dominates decisions indicating that decision making can take substantial time. In accordance with previous studies, we suggest that our results are best explained with a two-stage model of decision making where a leaky evidence integration stage precedes a race-to-threshold process. © 2013 Rüter et al.
|Divisions:||Div F > Computational and Biological Learning|
|Depositing User:||Unnamed user with email firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Date Deposited:||15 Dec 2015 13:15|
|Last Modified:||11 Feb 2016 06:48|