CUED Publications database

A comparison of methods currently used in inclusive design.

Goodman-Deane, J and Ward, J and Hosking, I and Clarkson, PJ (2013) A comparison of methods currently used in inclusive design. Appl Ergon, 45. pp. 886-894.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Inclusive design has unique challenges because it aims to improve usability for a wide range of users. This typically includes people with lower levels of ability, as well as mainstream users. This paper examines the effectiveness of two methods that are used in inclusive design: user trials and exclusion calculations (an inclusive design inspection method). A study examined three autoinjectors using both methods (n=30 for the user trials). The usability issues identified by each method are compared and the effectiveness of the methods is discussed. The study found that each method identified different kinds of issues, all of which are important for inclusive design. We therefore conclude that a combination of methods should be used in inclusive design rather than relying on a single method. Recommendations are also given for how the individual methods can be used more effectively in this context.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Exclusion Inclusive design Methods Adolescent Adult Equipment Design Female Human Engineering Humans Injections Male Middle Aged Self Care Workload Young Adult
Subjects: UNSPECIFIED
Divisions: Div C > Engineering Design
Depositing User: Cron Job
Date Deposited: 17 Jul 2017 19:06
Last Modified: 21 Nov 2017 03:35
DOI: