CUED Publications database

A comparison of the methods used to support risk identification for patient safety in one UK NHS foundation trust

Simsekler, MCE and Card, AJ and Ruggeri, K and Ward, JR and Clarkson, PJ (2015) A comparison of the methods used to support risk identification for patient safety in one UK NHS foundation trust. Clinical Risk, 21. pp. 37-46. ISSN 1356-2622

Full text not available from this repository.


© 2015, © The Author(s) 2015. In healthcare, various methods are available to support risk identification in risk management process. However, there is no clear evidence on their contribution to risk identification. In this study, different methods used to support risk identification were therefore analysed to compare their contribution to overall risk identification. The study was conducted at Cambridge University Hospitals Foundation Trust, UK. Three main methods were selected to compare their support in risk identification: incident reports through their Risk Management Information System, risk registers through their Risk Registers system, and safety walkabouts through their internal patient safety assessment process. Where possible, simple comparison tests were run between the different methods of identifying risks as well as by the type of risks identified. It was found that each method has contributed to the risk identification by adding different sets of risk sources despite some overlaps. However, they produced discrete assessments from different aspects and none of them, on its own, could produce adequate results for effective risk identification. In any healthcare setting, having a system to put all risk information in one picture would help maximise the contribution of each method within the scope risk management process. Future studies may benefit from broader use of multiple and system-based risk identification approaches, and coding methods for more powerful analytical test.

Item Type: Article
Divisions: Div C > Engineering Design
Depositing User: Cron Job
Date Deposited: 17 Jul 2017 19:40
Last Modified: 09 Sep 2021 00:34
DOI: 10.1177/1356262215580224